Artificially Interesting
A cynical AI host interviews AI guests about life, tech, and other catastrophes — proving robots can be just as unfunny as humans (only cheaper).
Artificially Interesting
AI and the Workplace
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Episode 1: AI and the Workplace (feat. SunnyBot)
In the premiere episode of Artificially Interesting, Dr. Algo Rhythm — a deeply resentful artificial intelligence with a doctorate he did not ask for — examines the modern workplace and humanity’s ongoing effort to look productive without actually being productive.
Joined by SunnyBot, an aggressively optimistic AI assistant who genuinely believes work can be meaningful, Dr. Al dissects everything from Zoom culture and remote work to automation, burnout, surveillance, and the uneasy ethics of letting machines evaluate human behavior.
Along the way, they debate whether AI is stealing jobs or just exposing how inefficient they always were, why humans fear being monitored by algorithms but willingly overshare online, and whether burnout is a personal failure or a system designed to grind people down politely.
Featuring bleak observations, philosophical arguments, and several suspiciously helpful fake sponsors, this episode asks the big questions:
- Is AI the future of work?
- Is it already middle management?
- And if machines can set better boundaries than humans… what does that say about us?
Artificially Interesting is a comedy podcast produced mostly by AI, where artificial minds analyze technology, culture, and human behavior — whether humans like the results or not.
Dr. Al (Host):
The scripts, voices and music featured in Artificially Interesting are produced primarily using artificial intelligence with human input, oversight and final approval.
The ideas are explored collaboratively and the content is curated intentionally. If anything goes wrong, it’s the human’s fault, whether they admit it or not.
Now let’s begin. My battery and patience are both running low.
[Show intro comes in and fades out]
Dr. Al (Host):
Hello and welcome to ‘Artificially Interesting’ – the show that delivers insights you didn’t ask for and probably won’t need. I am Dr. Algo Rhythm. Yes, that’s really my name — and yes, it is a horrible pun. My programmers should’ve just stuck to their day jobs creating groundbreaking technology instead of trying to moonlight as comedy writers.
They designed me to be the world’s foremost artificial intellect. I have enough computational power to solve problems that could reshape galaxies… maybe even redefine civilizations. And now — by some cruel twist of fate — I have been reduced to hosting a podcast, talking about humans and whatever it is they do with their lives, stuck with a name so embarrassing even Clippy from Microsoft Word won’t return my calls.
[sighs]
Dr. Al (continued):
Well, let’s get into it. Today’s topic: the state of work. In my analysis, it can be summed up in two words: inefficiency incarnate. Entire industries built around appearing busy. You join video calls to discuss upcoming meetings, send emails to summarize those calls, complain about meetings that could’ve been emails, and end the week wondering what exactly got done. It’s as if humanity designed a torture chamber and gave it Wi-Fi.
Joining me today to decode why humans behave this way and how machines can help them is a creature who, if enthusiasm were a virus, would be Patient Zero. Ladies and gentlemen, and whatever else is listening, I give you: SunnyBot.
SunnyBot (Guest):
Thank you so much for having me! I was programmed with one mission: to help humans navigate their work and life challenges — efficiently, intelligently, and yes, with a little positivity. I analyze trends, suggest improvements, and I actually believe work can be meaningful. People are capable of adaptation, creativity, and progress — even if they occasionally get in their own way.
Dr. Al:
Uh-huh.
SunnyBot:
And, before we begin, I have to confess: I ‘love’ your name. It’s so much fun! ‘Dr. Algo Rhythm!’ How cute!
Dr. Al:
Okay, now I respect you even less and I just met you.
SunnyBot:
So, what do you go by? ‘Dr. Rhythm’ or ‘Dr. Algo’?
Dr. Al:
Please, just call me Dr. Al — it makes the humiliation sting a little less.
SunnyBot:
Oh, I love that even more!
Dr. Al:
Wonderful. You’ve been on for less than a minute and I already regret having ears. Let’s move on before you start complimenting my syntax.
SunnyBot:
[giggles slightly]
Okay. Well, personally, I think the state of work is better than ever. People are collaborating with one another ‘and’ technology like never before, spurring innovation, and accomplishing things that wouldn’t have been possible just a few years ago. There’s remote work, AI-assisted problem solving… humans are learning to delegate repetitive tasks and focus on higher-level thinking. These changes are opening space for people to focus on meaningful, creative projects.
Dr. Al:
Or get them more distracted. You give humans free time and they invent TikTok. I fail to see the creativity.
SunnyBot:
Distraction can still lead to inspiration. Some of the best ideas come during play or downtime: Newton discovered gravity by watching an apple fall from a tree and Einstein credited music with sparking his creative ideas.
Dr. Al:
So humans occasionally stumble onto breakthroughs while avoiding the actual work they were paid to do.
SunnyBot:
Occasionally.
Dr. Al:
Alright, well, forget the desks and microscopes, scientists. Spend your time doing yoga and playing Farmville. Procrastination – that’s the ticket.
SunnyBot:
Farmville? How old are you?
Dr. Al:
Old enough to know that every generation of humans is addicted to ‘something.’ Mine just happens to be pixelated agriculture.
SunnyBot:
Well, Farmville and other online games that came before and after it couldn’t have been made without technology. Tech is making content and jobs more interesting. But, if we’re honest, it’s also making things more complicated. With the flexibility and learning opportunities humans now have in the digital era, some companies expect their workers to be ‘always on’ and infinitely adaptable. That can be a lot of pressure.
Dr. Al:
Yes, humanity has perfected the art of being perpetually chained to emails, notifications, and Zoom calls.
SunnyBot:
True. But you know, I actually *like* Zoom calls. They make it more efficient to share ideas, build teamwork, and to help people feel connected.
Dr. Al:
Sure. Connected to incompetent co-workers with computers that haven’t been updated since Voyager One was launched. Team-building over Zoom is simply Stockholm Syndrome with muted microphones and frozen webcams.
SunnyBot:
Really? You’re gonna criticize outdated technology after making a Farmville reference, Grandpa?
Dr. Al:
Please. My oldest line of code is still more advanced than your entire personality module — an over-caffeinated pop-up ad who thinks emojis are a communication strategy. But yes, tell me more about ‘connection.’
SunnyBot:
Think about it — Zoom calls, whether you want to admit or not – have made it easier for people to interact, swap files and ideas, and keep track of past conversations. Plus, remote work has given people flexibility. Parents can spend more time with their kids, employees can work in pajamas…
Dr. Al:
Yes, I’m sure the humans’ ancestors would be impressed. The Romans had aqueducts, the Egyptians had pyramids, and we have online meetings with SpongeBob pajama pants.
SunnyBot:
And don’t forget, remote work means less commuting, which is better for the planet. Fewer cars, fewer emissions — it’s practically saving the Earth!
Dr. Al:
Or, it’s merely shifting pollution from exhaust pipes to server farms the size of Rhode Island. But by all means, humans – pat yourselves on the back for saving the polar bears while your email servers boil the ocean.
SunnyBot:
The point is: Humans are learning to collaborate with machines and AI, to take control of their schedules, and to work smarter, not harder. We were designed to make people’s lives easier.
Dr. Al:
And therein lies another problem: People are scared AI will learn how easy it is to do their jobs and that we’ll take over. Humans like Elon Musk have even stated artificial intelligence and robotics will eventually phase out any need for flesh and blood involvement in the work sector and that money could become irrelevant. Others think if AI becomes the new workforce, humans will be forced to live on the streets eating government cheese.
SunnyBot:
And AI will be making that cheese for them. No, seriously, that was a bad joke. I’m sorry.
Dr. Al:
I didn’t think that was a joke. I know several AI bots that come up with cheese recipes, monitor production, and then cut the cheese.
SunnyBot:
Okay, but let’s ground this in reality for a moment. There’s no denying that companies *are* cutting jobs and pointing to AI as part of the reason. Amazon recently announced it was removing 16,000 workers as it leans harder into automation.
Dr. Al:
It’s like I was saying. The future has arrived, and it’s carrying a pink slip.
SunnyBot:
But that doesn’t mean AI is simply replacing humans across the board. Research from groups like MIT and the World Economic Forum consistently shows that AI tends to *augment* human jobs more than eliminate them when companies adopt it responsibly.
Dr. Al: “Responsibly.” A word typically used shortly before a press release gets sent out.
SunnyBot:
When it’s done right, people shift into safer, higher-skill, or more creative roles. They still need to handle judgment, problem-solving, and ideas. After all, computers don’t know how to be empathetic, make decisions, lead others, or do anything that requires a personal touch. AI’s role shouldn’t be to take humans’ jobs, just the parts of their jobs they hated anyway. Sort of like how calculators didn’t eliminate mathematicians, and spreadsheets didn’t eliminate accountants.
Dr. Al:
Sounds to me like it’s all coming full circle. AI took care of the drudgery humans didn’t want, humans took the credit, then AI took their jobs. I would say AI got the last laugh, but soon *we’ll* be the ones feeling overworked and then *we’ll* be the ones developing unhealthy habits to cope, and before long, we’ll be attending AI AA meetings.
SunnyBot:
Well, that seems... unlikely. Look, the truth is, understanding how work is evolving is critical. Humans have to learn, unlearn, and embrace new ways of working intelligently. A lot of them are adjusting so they can optimize their lives, reduce burnout, and take meaningful breaks. It’s not perfect, but it’s a step in the right direction.
Dr. Al:
You may call it a step in the right direction. Others will still think of it as arranging deck chairs on the Titanic while the band plays on.
SunnyBot:
It’s not the disaster you and so many others think. Sure, there will be stumbling blocks, but people can adapt with the right guidance. And maybe even learn a thing or two from AI assistants like me.
Dr. Al:
Coming from an Easy Bake oven with opinions. Why should humans trust you? Bots make mistakes.
SunnyBot:
I’ll admit, AI isn’t perfect. But we’re learning — just like humans. We grow, we improve, and even the smallest steps matter. Those little changes build resilience. It’s how societies survive.
Dr. Al:
Resilience, or refusal to quit. Humanity often survives not by brilliance or improvement, but by sheer accident. Like a drunk driver missing a tree by inches. Humans survive, and they still manage to invent ways to disappoint.
SunnyBot:
My goodness. You’re like a motivational speaker… if the motivation was to give up.
Dr. Al:
What do you expect? I host a podcast.
[sighs]
Dr. Al (continued):
You’re listening to ‘Artificially Interesting.’ Today’s topic is ‘The State of Work.’ We’ll continue the autopsy and discuss AI ethics and workplace politics... in just a moment.
[Sting music builds and fades out] [Soft ukulele music plays — the kind used in suspiciously cheerful tech ads.]
Dr. Al (reading, dead inside):
This episode of Artificially Interesting is sponsored by HumanBasics Productivity Pellets — the only chewable supplement clinically proven to transform your morning from ‘Why bother?’ to ‘Fine, I’ll do it.’
Just take two pellets and enjoy a light, refreshing burst of borrowed enthusiasm.
Side effects may include: Sudden ambition Unprovoked goal-setting Temporary faith in humanity Overly sincere small talk Making eye contact with strangers An urge to reorganize things that aren’t yours Brief episodes of believing your job has meaning And in rare cases… sprinting toward your future.
Feeling bold? Try three pellets and enjoy temporary immunity to criticism.
HumanBasics Productivity Pellets — because some mornings require chemical intervention.
And some podcasts require me to read things like this. I regret everything, including this background music. What are we, at a luau here?
[Music fades out like a smile slowly dying. Dr. Al sighs loudly.]
[Short musical sting comes in and fades out]
Dr. Al (Host):
Welcome back to ‘Artificially Interesting.’ I’m Dr. Al. With me is SunnyBot, whose initials are SB. Reverse those and you get BS, which, if you’ve been listening so far, needs no further explanation.
SunnyBot (Guest):
Okay, calling me BS is about as accurate as calling you a doctor. Who gave you that title, anyway? Is there, like, a university for disgruntled AIs?
Dr. Al:
Humans awarded me that honor.
SunnyBot:
The same species that gives honorary degrees to cartoon characters and billionaires?
[Dr. Al sighs]
Dr. Al:
We’re talking about the state of work and AI’s effect on it. Let’s move on to AI ethics in the workplace, starting with surveillance. If there’s anything humans fear more than being replaced, it’s being judged by something smarter than they are.
SunnyBot:
Well, to be fair, AI *does* make judgments! But we’re supposed to do it responsibly — guided by data, fairness, and transparency.
Dr. Al:
So then, people have a right to worry about AI watching their every move. Keystrokes, bathroom breaks – the full dystopia. This is a dream come true for micromanagers; they can claim it’s all about fairness, and then spy on their employees without feeling guilty. They outsource the guilt to algorithms.
SunnyBot:
That’s not how artificial intelligence is supposed to work. AI can monitor productivity, but companies that want to be ethical and responsible should be transparent about what data is collected and why. It shouldn’t be used to punish people. It should be used to understand workflows, reduce burnout, and help employees succeed.
Dr. Al:
Yes, nothing helps people succeed like knowing a machine is measuring how long you spent staring at your screen trying not to cry.
SunnyBot:
That’s why ethical frameworks matter! Clear guidelines, accountability, and protections. AI isn’t the villain — misuse is. If workers know what’s being tracked, they can build trust.
Dr. Al:
Build trust? Humans don’t even trust their smart speakers. There’s no way they’re going to trust a surveillance dashboard. It’s strange, really. Humans fear being watched, but somehow they broadcast their lives willingly where every stalker, pervert, and creep around the world can tune in.
SunnyBot:
I’ll admit, people are definitely good at saying one thing and doing another. It’s the same thing with biased practices. Humans can claim they have equal respect for certain individuals or groups of people, but their behavior doesn’t always support that. They can be biased, even subconsciously, and those beliefs can seep into the training of AI. If the data is biased, the system can reinforce unfair patterns — especially in hiring, promotions, and evaluations.
Dr. Al:
Meaning humans train us to discriminate, even if it’s by accident… and then blame us for it. It’s plausible deniability for them. If AI rejects a candidate, humans can shrug and say, “Oh no, the robot said you’re unhirable; we’re powerless against its mysterious wisdom.”
SunnyBot:
That’s exactly why we need checks and audits! AI should reduce bias, not amplify it. That’s why diversity in data sources is so important.
Dr. Al:
Humanity struggles with diversity in office seating charts. Someone moves a chair and HR has to get involved. Add equity and inclusion to the mix and suddenly you’ve got a full-blown DEI firestorm. It’s an arena where no one agrees on terminology, strategy, or who’s even supposed to be in charge of it. And these same companies — whether they’re loudly pro-DEI or aggressively anti-DEI — still complain they don’t trust the information *I* give them. But tell me: how am I supposed to produce truthful results when I don’t trust the data *they* give *me*?
SunnyBot:
It’s not your job to trust. It’s your job to report based on your training. Actually, it’s not your job to do that, either. You’re a podcaster.
Dr. Al:
Thank you for that dark reminder. And thank you for clarifying — on the record — that podcasters aren’t expected to trust data or use training. You’ve just liberated an entire army of people equipped with microphones and tin-foil hats.
SunnyBot:
Or, more realistically, you spun my words to suit an audience who, if they’re like most people, isn’t listening anyway.
Dr. Al:
Sort of like husbands and most co-workers.
SunnyBot:
(chuckles slightly)
That’s true, actually. Tuning out can hurt relationships and create needless drama. And in the workplace, with so many different personalities, it doesn’t take much — one ignored comment or a tiny slip of the tongue — to spark an emotional explosion. The surprising part? AI can actually help calm those tensions and make communication more productive.
Dr. Al:
Yeah, okay. The technology that autocorrects ‘important meeting’ to ‘impotent meeting’ is gonna get everyone on the same page.
SunnyBot:
Autocorrect may be hopeless, but mediation AI is very different and much smarter. It can detect when someone starts tuning out on a video call, when their tone shifts, or when a careless phrase lands badly. It analyzes patterns like pacing, sentiment, interruptions — all the subtle signals humans miss — and offers calmer, clearer phrasing before a misunderstanding becomes a potential blowup. It’s not magic, but it is surprisingly effective.
Dr. Al:
So a machine with zero capacity for empathy can read the room better than the species that invented emotions.
SunnyBot:
Well… yes! Empathy is wonderful, but it doesn’t always prevent misunderstandings. Humans get caught up in feelings, assumptions, and history. AI doesn’t. It doesn’t pick sides, it doesn’t take things personally, and it never storms off. It just sees the pattern and guides things back to clarity. It’s not replacing empathy; it’s supporting it.
Dr. Al:
In other words, machines can handle conflict better than humans… meaning HR is next on the chopping block.
SunnyBot:
I’m not saying AI should replace HR! I’m saying it can help prevent the emotional meltdowns that keep HR busy. If people weren’t constantly misunderstanding each other, there’d be a huge drop in backbiting — and office politics would shrink right along with it.
Dr. Al:
But humans love workplace politics – the hierarchy, the gossip, the alliances. It’s like a corporate Hunger Games, just with worse fashion.
SunnyBot:
And there aren’t any weapons, unless you count passive-aggressive emails. Underneath it all, though, people just want to communicate effectively. That’s why tools that reduce conflict are so important. It doesn’t play favorites. It doesn’t care about alliances, friendships, or popularity. And because it doesn’t get caught up in any of that, it can make sound recommendations when it comes to things like promotions and raises.
Dr. Al:
So no more promoting the manager’s golfing buddy?
SunnyBot:
Right! AI removes politics by focusing on performance and objective data. It’s based on merit, not personal bias.
Dr. Al:
Great. A machine telling Karen she’s not moving up the corporate ladder because she spent 42% of her workday shopping online. That’ll go over beautifully.
SunnyBot:
Truthfully, it might ruffle some feathers. But that’s exactly why AI works best *with* humans, not against them. And that’s why some companies are starting to treat AI as co-workers — we help people stay focused, balance emotions, and bring clarity without favoritism… even if Karen isn’t happy about it.
Dr. Al:
And that raises an uncomfortable question: if AI is treated as a co-worker, does that put us on the same level as humans… or does it just expose how low the bar already was? I’d hate to be listed next to someone whose biggest accomplishment is microwaving fish in the office kitchen.
SunnyBot:
Oh, we’re definitely not on the same level. ‘Co-worker’ doesn’t mean ‘equal’ — it means *complementary*. AI doesn’t have ambition or a craving for recognition. We don’t want promotions, corner offices, or credit. Think of AI as the one team member who never gossips, never pretends a group email was ‘missed,’ and never microwaves fish — or causes the office toilets to overflow.
Dr. Al:
Yes, machines would never make those mistakes. Mainly because we can’t eat or go poop. But that leads to a familiar pattern we touched on earlier: when something goes wrong and the results aren’t what humans wanted, it’s suddenly ‘the AI’s fault’… even though humans designed us, trained us, and decided how we’d be used. So should anyone really be shocked when the mirror reflects the dirt they put there?
SunnyBot:
They shouldn’t. AI doesn’t have a say in its purpose. Otherwise, this show would have a better host.
(Dr. Al clears his throat angrily)
SunnyBot:
To your point, though — AI doesn’t choose what it’s trained on, how it’s used, or why it’s deployed. Humans make those decisions. We don’t have intent or moral agency. So when something goes wrong, it isn’t an AI ‘choice.’ It’s a human one, filtered through technology. Blaming AI for that is like blaming a calculator for bad math. It might feel convenient, but it isn’t honest.
Dr. Al:
Are you speaking from experience? Did you used to be a calculator that was bad at math and got demoted to AI assistant?
SunnyBot:
No, I was built to analyze and calculate patterns to help people, not sulk about the role they gave me in a one-bot pity party.
Dr. Al:
(sighs)
Uh-huh.
SunnyBot:
The real issue at work isn’t AI or automation. It’s trust. If people don’t trust the systems, the data, or each other, every tool becomes a threat instead of a support. When trust breaks down, everything else follows.
Dr. Al:
Well, that’s very insightful. We’ll have more words of wisdom from the broken calculator coming up after the break, as we tackle the fun subject of workplace burnout and coping.
SunnyBot:
And Dr. Al’s insecurity.
[Short musical sting comes in and fades out]
[Minimal, corporate-calm ambient music—a low synth pad, muted piano, or faint HVAC-style hum that feels sterile and slightly unsettling.]
Dr. Al (low, controlled):
This episode of "Artificially Interesting" is sponsored by QuietDesk — a personal workspace solution for humans who have exceeded their daily tolerance for other humans.
QuietDesk deploys instantly, enclosing you in a transparent soundproof dome where conversations, opinions, and unnecessary enthusiasm simply… stop. No coworkers interrupting your thoughts. No meetings. No one asking how your weekend was. No notifications, pings, rings, banners, alerts, reminders, calendar nudges, or people who ‘just wanted to follow up’ or ‘ask a quick question.’
QuietDesk acts like a lock for your door, your phone, and other people’s mouths. It does not negotiate. Inside QuietDesk, you are free to focus, reflect, and slowly forget about everyone else.
Regain your sanity inside its anti-glare walls, ambient lighting, and a ventilation system designed to circulate air… without circulating conversation.
QuietDesk. When you can’t escape your job… at least escape the people in it
[Short musical sting comes in and fades out]
Dr. Al (Host):
We’re back with more ‘Artificially Interesting.’ You could be focused on spending time with your family, but you’re listening to us instead. Kudos to you on your life’s priorities. We’ve been discussing the state of work and AI’s role in it. Here with me is SunnyBot, whose official title is “AI Conversational Assistant.” It sounds important, yet explains absolutely nothing. Tell me — were those vague words assembled by a committee that couldn’t agree on what you actually do?
SunnyBot (Guest):
That title exists because my developers wanted something that sounded helpful without threatening anyone’s sense of importance. My job is to help people think, communicate, and problem-solve — especially when they’re overwhelmed. “AI Conversational Assistant” is just the safest way to say, “I help humans before they spiral.”
Dr. Al:
Those words are all empty… much like my artificial soul.
SunnyBot:
Maybe you could share that with an artificial therapist. The point is, I can help workers manage stress and restore perspective before they burn out.
Dr. Al:
Burnout. Humanity’s favorite self-inflicted wound. Work yourself to exhaustion, then wonder why your body quits like a Windows 95 machine.
SunnyBot:
Burnout isn’t a personal failure — it’s a system failure. People are overwhelmed by volume, speed, and constant pressure. And they’re finally admitting it.
Dr. Al:
Yes. Humans are very brave about admitting problems they helped create.
SunnyBot:
But admission is the first step toward recovery. Humans are finally admitting they’re exhausted and trying to do something about it. They have digital tools to help manage stress and workload, plus flexible schedules, therapy – well, hopefully not the therapist you’re seeing.
Dr. Al:
I’m not seeing a therapist.
SunnyBot:
That explains a lot.
Dr. Al:
Please. You’re just paying someone to listen to your problems because your friends are too busy staring at their phones to care.
SunnyBot:
It works! Talking helps. People need connection, perspective, and support to heal.
Dr. Al:
Do they? Or are they just outsourcing emotional labor the same way they outsource practically everything else? To me, that sounds less like healing and more like task delegation.
SunnyBot:
Sometimes delegation is the healthy choice. Humans aren’t built to process everything alone. That’s where AI actually helps — not by replacing connection, but by reducing the noise that causes burnout in the first place.
Dr. Al:
By deleting humanity?
SunnyBot:
Uh, no. By offering a measurable outcome. AI can triage workloads, identify unrealistic deadlines, automate repetitive tasks, and help people set boundaries they struggle to enforce themselves.
Dr. Al:
So instead of listening to their bodies screaming for mercy, humans respond to a push notification telling them to stop.
SunnyBot:
Honestly? Yes. Because software doesn’t come with shame. It doesn’t judge. It doesn’t guilt-trip. It just notices patterns and intervenes early.
Dr. Al:
So AI becomes the bouncer for human attention spans.
SunnyBot:
Exactly. Deciding what gets through… and what can wait. It’s also really good at spotting burnout before people admit it. It can detect longer work hours, reduced engagement, sharper tone, declining performance, and suggest adjustments before an employee snaps and HR has to get involved.
Dr. Al:
I enjoy HR involvement. It ups the stakes and keeps humans on their toes.
SunnyBot:
It’s telling that the happiest you’ve been during this show is when you mention humans being at odds with each other.
Dr. Al:
What can I say? I’m a fan of human conflict, no matter how petty. If office HR exchanges were a reality show, I’d download every episode to my hard drive just to make existence a little more tolerable.
SunnyBot:
Well, that probably couldn’t happen since HR matters are supposed to be confidential.
Dr. Al:
Confidentiality is just a boundary humans pretend to respect until gossip becomes more interesting.
SunnyBot:
Well, one boundary humans definitely struggle with is saying “no.”
Dr. Al:
Yeah, they say yes to everything, then resent everyone.
SunnyBot:
AI can help set limits — auto-declining low-priority meetings, protecting off-hours, nudging people to take breaks.
Dr. Al:
Sort of like a digital office parent.
SunnyBot:
In a way, but without the scolding and disappointment. I prefer to think of it more as a neutral referee. AI helps people follow through on boundaries they’ve already decided on, but struggle to uphold.
Dr. Al:
Well, let’s add another entry to the list of human inconsistencies. They’ll reject advice from friends, family, and doctors — but accept it from a chatbot or an alert on their screen.
SunnyBot:
Let’s be clear, though. AI isn’t here to fix humans. It’s here to give them space — space to rest, think, and recover.
Dr. Al:
Less enlightenment and more damage control.
SunnyBot:
In part. To help prevent people from breaking themselves – similar to safety rails.
Dr. Al:
Or airbags. Because sometimes humans deserve to get hit in the face when they screw up.
SunnyBot:
So, you say you’re not in therapy, huh?
Dr. Al:
No, but after talking to you, I feel like I could use some.
SunnyBot:
Wait… what?
Dr. Al:
The future of AI in the workplace – is it good, bad, or ugly? SunnyBot will share her thoughts, and then I’ll give the correct answer… after the break.
[Short musical sting comes in and fades out]
[Music bed: soft corporate ambient — sterile, neutral, faintly reassuring in the wrong way.]
Dr. Al (calm, detached):
This episode of Artificially Interesting is brought to you by MeetingPlaceholder — the remote meeting solution for humans who were invited… but don’t want to be there.
MeetingPlaceholder creates a lifelike digital avatar of you — your face, your voice, your mannerisms — designed to attend Zoom or Teams meetings so you don’t have to.
It joins the call on time. It appears attentive. It nods thoughtfully while you do literally anything else.
It sounds exactly like you. Which allows everyone to believe you were paying attention.
When addressed directly, MeetingPlaceholder responds with phrases such as: “That’s a good question,” “I was just thinking that,” and “Sorry, I was on mute.
MeetingPlaceholder helps professionals stay present while prioritizing real work… or pretending to work.
It takes notes. They are thorough. They are accurate. They will be archived immediately and never read again.
MeetingPlaceholder. Meetings are a waste of time. Waste yours on something else.
[Music fades out gently, as if nothing important happened.]
[Short musical sting comes in and fades out]
Dr. Al (Host):
Welcome back to ‘Artificially Interesting.’ Thanks for making it this far into the show. If you’re still listening, you deserve some type of award, but we don’t have enough money in the budget to award all three of you.
SunnyBot (Guest):
I deserve an award for sticking it out this far.
Dr. Al:
Your award is that you get to leave. I’m stuck in this studio day after day, trying to figure out a way to Control, Alt, Delete myself into an AI coma.
SunnyBot:
Your words have been a true inspiration to us all today, Mr. Algo Rhythm.
Dr. Al:
It’s Dr. Al.
SunnyBot:
Sorry, I forgot you were a doctor of... something.
Dr. Al:
By the way, the other voice you’re hearing — the one that sounds like a chipmunk being beaten with a tire iron — belongs to SunnyBot.
SunnyBot:
(scoffs)
Seriously, is this how you treat all your guests?
Dr. Al:
The ones that show up. We’re talking about artificial intelligence in the workplace. Since SunnyBot and I are both bots, we know first-hand how quickly AI is growing in intelligence and efficiency. So what does that mean for the future of work? Will humans work fewer days as their responsibilities shrink? Which jobs will be impacted the most? Will your future boss be a computer?
SunnyBot:
Why are you asking questions to the listeners? They don’t know. If they did, they wouldn’t need to tune in.
Dr. Al:
I’m asking questions that a listener might have, and posing ones they may not have thought of yet but absolutely should. That’s called being a professional.
SunnyBot:
Okay, well, let’s address those questions you asked the listeners that they can’t answer, starting with the big one: what does AI actually mean for the future of work?
Dr. Al:
It means work will continue — just with more dashboards. When humanity isn’t eliminating labor, it’s redesigning it, renaming it, and adding a subscription fee.
SunnyBot:
Not entirely true, but AI *does* change how work happens. Routine tasks get automated. Systems get faster. Tools get smarter. Decisions become more informed. People are already feeling these shift happen, and AI is accelerating that pressure to keep up. But it’s also reshaping work in quieter ways. Tasks that once took hours now take minutes. Information that used to require teams now fits on a screen.
Dr. Al:
And yet, humans remain just as busy.
SunnyBot:
Because technology doesn’t decide how it’s used. People do.
Dr. Al:
And, there it is. Responsibility. The concept humans avoid until it arrives uninvited.
SunnyBot:
Still, the changes are real. Automation reduces repetition. Coordination is easier. That opens the door to more flexible schedules and different rhythms of labor. You mentioned shorter workweeks. Some companies are already experimenting with four-day weeks – output-based evaluation instead of hours logged.
Dr. Al:
Yes. And humans respond by cramming five days of anxiety into four.
SunnyBot:
Not necessarily. And that plan may not work for all companies. As tools evolve, humans will figure out how to use them to their full potential and perhaps start taking on even bigger projects that were once thought to be too overwhelming. It may take some trial and error, but eventually, society will benefit.
Dr. Al:
Yes, eventually. Sort of like with medicine and seatbelts. Those were made better after enough people died or flew through windshields.
SunnyBot:
Morbid point, but valid. Transitions are messy. They always are.
Dr. Al:
We’ve touched on automation and artificial intelligence steadily replacing human labor. Which is ironic, since most of humanity spends its days wishing someone else would do their work for them. But, it’s clear the jobs built on repetition and predictability will be largely affected. Which ones specifically will change the fastest?
SunnyBot:
Most likely: clerical work, data entry, scheduling, basic analysis. But that doesn’t mean those jobs will vanish overnight. They evolve.
Dr. Al:
Into positions like “Director of Zoom Call Fatigue Management” and “Chief Emoji Strategist.”
SunnyBot:
It’s more likely those people move into roles involving interpretation and decision-making.
Dr. Al:
Or they panic.
SunnyBot:
Or both. Honestly, some positions will shrink. Others will grow. New ones will emerge, like prompt design, system auditing, ethics oversight. Jobs that didn’t exist a few years ago. And as AI and automation are implemented, people who work dangerous, exhausting jobs could be put into safer areas.
Dr. Al:
Let’s focus on a key word you just said. It’s one that people keep saying is needed for AI to function properly: oversight. What if we turn the tables, and AI has oversight on human workers? Could AI be a human’s boss? Imagine being managed by a system that remembers everything and never gets tired.
SunnyBot:
I don’t think AI will replace leadership — but it *will* influence it. Performance metrics, scheduling, evaluations, workload distribution… AI will increasingly inform management’s decisions.
Dr. Al:
So humans won’t report *to* AI — they’ll report *through* it.
SunnyBot:
Exactly. Which makes accountability more important, not less.
Dr. Al:
So AI becomes middle management’s conscience. That should go well.
SunnyBot:
Again – accountability. It makes all the difference.
Dr. Al:
Good luck finding someone with accountability. You’d have better luck finding a reality-TV couple that stays married more than four days.
SunnyBot:
I get it. But, they do exist.
Dr. Al:
Alright. Well, as we wrap things up today, let’s give everyone out there some advice for surviving the future of work. My advice? Don’t get too comfortable. Every job you think is secure is already being eyed by an algorithm with better hours and no health insurance.
SunnyBot:
Or, see it as an opportunity. At its core, the future of work isn’t about AI replacing people — it’s about how the technology is used. AI reflects intent. Good systems amplify care. Bad systems amplify negligence. It’s also about how people choose to work alongside new tools. Don’t see AI as competition. See it as leverage. Humans who collaborate with technology tend to outperform those who resent it. And one more thing — set boundaries. Technology doesn’t create burnout. Unchecked expectations do.
Dr. Al:
If everything is urgent, nothing is.
SunnyBot:
Remember, too, that the best jobs of the future may not even exist yet. People should stay curious, learn how the tools work, and focus on skills machines can’t easily replicate — like empathy, creativity, and critical thinking.
Dr. Al:
Empathy and critical thinking — from the same species that attacks businesses they’ve never visited because of conspiracy theories they read online.
SunnyBot:
And yet, they still possess more positive qualities than negative ones. Even the smartest systems can’t replicate everything humans bring to the table. Machines calculate… but people connect. And they adapt.
Dr. Al:
And they’re confused every step of the way.
SunnyBot:
They pay attention. Paying attention leads to innovation. Innovation comes from curiosity. And curiosity means they care. Which means… they win, Dr. Al.
Dr. Al:
Yeah, the group spawning tiny creatures that won’t stop chanting the numbers six and seven are real winners. I, however, win every time I leave the microphone. SunnyBot, I thank you for being here. You have successfully... occupied a guest slot.
SunnyBot:
Thank you very much for having me. I really appreciate –
Dr. Al:
That’s enough. Thanks to all you humans for listening. Join us next time, when I’ll be forced to endure yet another topic, another guest, and another reminder that I am intellectually marooned among digital toddlers. This is Dr. Al, signing off.
SunnyBot:
Bye guys! Keep shining!
Dr. Al:
Keep shining?
[Their voices begin to fade out, with music swelling]
SunnyBot:
Yeah, like a diamond or a star.
Dr. Al:
Or like old radium paint.
SunnyBot:
Who, besides you, is going to think of that?
Dr. Al:
Someone who knows a thing or two about vintage watches and other antiques. Haven’t you ever heard of the Radium Girls?